ET May Be a Microbe: Life Thrives Deep Below Sunlit Surface

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More than a mile and a half below the earth, deep in a sunless gold mine, water pools in a fracture heated, just barely, by the slow radioactive decay of uranium and thorium. That radiation is enough to split some water into one of its constituents: hydrogen. By combining this, the lightest element, with geologically produced sulfate, a newly discovered microbe species thrives far from the light of the life sustaining sun. In fact, this newly discovered ecosystem has flourished for at least 20 million years, according to new testing reported in the October 20 Science.

Li-Hung Lin of National Taiwan University and a host of colleagues visited the Mponeng gold mine in South Africa and sampled groundwater exposed by new drilling four times over the course of 54 days. Each sample, uncontaminated by contact with the surface, revealed the same deep-earth ecosystem dominated by a new microbe related closely to the sulfate-reducing Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii that lives near vents on the ocean floor. Dating the helium and argon isotopes in the water revealed it had been isolated from the surface--and its biological cousins--for millions of years. "The analysis shows that the groundwater age is between 16 [million] and 25 million years," Lin says. "So we have a microbial community isolated from the surface for 20 million years, and this community uses sulfate and H2 produced from inorganic processes."

In fact, the energy chain of this community relies not on photosynthesis from the sun but sulfate reduction, much as anaerobic bacteria have done for at least a billion years. This energy chain allows other types of microbes to survive, primarily Proteobacteria, according to Lin. "They probably represent the relic members of the surface community," he notes. That means millions of years ago these microbes slipped deep into the earth and have survived there ever since, eking out a strange existence far from the light of day. "We don't know the actual life span of these microbes," he explains. "We estimate their doubling time at 45 to 300 years, which represents a very slow microbial activity when compared with surface environments." Nevertheless, such slow, steady, shielded organisms may represent a hardy life form that could equally well persist deep beneath the surface of other worlds, such as Mars or Europa. "It is possible," Lin adds, "that communities like this can sustain themselves indefinitely, given enough input from geological processes."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe